Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of RNASampler(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(20) |
|
RNASampler(20) |
| MCC |
0.622 |
>
|
0.573 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.620
±
0.196
|
>
|
0.587
±
0.193
|
| Sensitivity |
0.597 |
>
|
0.539 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.654 |
>
|
0.617 |
| Total TP |
123 |
>
|
111 |
| Total TN |
22999 |
<
|
23007 |
| Total FP |
94 |
<
|
106 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
14 |
<
|
21 |
| Total FP INCONS |
51 |
>
|
48 |
| Total FP COMP |
29 |
<
|
37 |
| Total FN |
83 |
<
|
95 |
| P-value |
1.80908287419e-08 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and RNASampler(20)).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and RNASampler(20)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and RNASampler(20)).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
123 |
| Total TN |
22999 |
| Total FP |
94 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
14 |
| Total FP INCONS |
51 |
| Total FP COMP |
29 |
| Total FN |
83 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.622 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.620
±
0.196
|
| Sensitivity |
0.597 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.654 |
| Nr of predictions |
10 |
Performance of RNASampler(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
111 |
| Total TN |
23007 |
| Total FP |
106 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
21 |
| Total FP INCONS |
48 |
| Total FP COMP |
37 |
| Total FN |
95 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.573 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.587
±
0.193
|
| Sensitivity |
0.539 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.617 |
| Nr of predictions |
10 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|