CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) Vsfold4
MCC 0.678 > 0.527
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.199 > 0.552 ± 0.208
Sensitivity 0.655 > 0.542
Positive Predictive Value 0.707 > 0.522
Total TP 116 > 96
Total TN 17649 > 17629
Total FP 74 < 125
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 35
Total FP INCONS 35 < 53
Total FP COMP 26 < 37
Total FN 61 < 81
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 116
Total TN 17649
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.678
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.199
Sensitivity 0.655
Positive Predictive Value 0.707
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 7 2728 11 2 5 4 8
3J3F_8 0.34 0.37 0.32 7 4739 24 5 10 9 12
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 96
Total TN 17629
Total FP 125
Total FP CONTRA 35
Total FP INCONS 53
Total FP COMP 37
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.527
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.552 ± 0.208
Sensitivity 0.542
Positive Predictive Value 0.522
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J3D_C 0.48 0.53 0.45 10 946 12 4 8 0 9
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.09 2 2720 32 9 11 12 13
3J3F_8 0.35 0.42 0.30 8 4734 30 11 8 11 11
4A1C_2 0.36 0.40 0.33 8 4492 28 4 12 12 12
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.