CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) Vsfold5
MCC 0.678 > 0.508
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.199 > 0.550 ± 0.248
Sensitivity 0.655 > 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.707 > 0.476
Total TP 116 > 98
Total TN 17649 > 17607
Total FP 74 < 149
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 43
Total FP INCONS 35 < 65
Total FP COMP 26 < 41
Total FN 61 < 79
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 116
Total TN 17649
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.678
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.199
Sensitivity 0.655
Positive Predictive Value 0.707
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 7 2728 11 2 5 4 8
3J3F_8 0.34 0.37 0.32 7 4739 24 5 10 9 12
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 98
Total TN 17607
Total FP 149
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 65
Total FP COMP 41
Total FN 79
Total Scores
MCC 0.508
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.550 ± 0.248
Sensitivity 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.476
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1198 6 3 2 1 5
3J3D_C 0.63 0.68 0.59 13 946 9 3 6 0 6
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.08 2 2718 31 10 12 9 13
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 38 13 11 14 10
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.