CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) Cylofold
MCC 0.779 > 0.634
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.742 ± 0.150 > 0.675 ± 0.239
Sensitivity 0.716 > 0.596
Positive Predictive Value 0.856 > 0.690
Total TP 131 > 109
Total TN 9038 > 9033
Total FP 33 < 52
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 16
Total FP INCONS 16 < 33
Total FP COMP 11 > 3
Total FN 52 < 74
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 131
Total TN 9038
Total FP 33
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 52
Total Scores
MCC 0.779
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.742 ± 0.150
Sensitivity 0.716
Positive Predictive Value 0.856
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 0 5 0 12
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3W3S_B 0.80 0.73 0.89 24 1962 6 1 2 3 9
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7
4FRG_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 1180 3 0 2 1 4
4FRN_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 22 1823 3 2 1 0 6

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 109
Total TN 9033
Total FP 52
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 74
Total Scores
MCC 0.634
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.675 ± 0.239
Sensitivity 0.596
Positive Predictive Value 0.690
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3W3S_B 0.48 0.45 0.52 15 1960 15 1 13 1 18
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3
4FRN_A 0.23 0.18 0.31 5 1832 11 7 4 0 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.