Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of MaxExpect
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & MaxExpect [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(seed) |
|
MaxExpect |
| MCC |
0.831 |
>
|
0.575 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.774
±
0.073
|
>
|
0.510
±
0.161
|
| Sensitivity |
0.802 |
>
|
0.585 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.863 |
>
|
0.566 |
| Total TP |
603 |
>
|
440 |
| Total TN |
451981 |
>
|
451902 |
| Total FP |
216 |
<
|
451 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
35 |
<
|
79 |
| Total FP INCONS |
61 |
<
|
259 |
| Total FP COMP |
120 |
>
|
113 |
| Total FN |
149 |
<
|
312 |
| P-value |
2.57237423209e-08 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and MaxExpect).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and MaxExpect).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and MaxExpect).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
603 |
| Total TN |
451981 |
| Total FP |
216 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
35 |
| Total FP INCONS |
61 |
| Total FP COMP |
120 |
| Total FN |
149 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.831 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.774
±
0.073
|
| Sensitivity |
0.802 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.863 |
| Nr of predictions |
16 |
Performance of MaxExpect
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
440 |
| Total TN |
451902 |
| Total FP |
451 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
79 |
| Total FP INCONS |
259 |
| Total FP COMP |
113 |
| Total FN |
312 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.575 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.510
±
0.161
|
| Sensitivity |
0.585 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.566 |
| Nr of predictions |
16 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|