Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of Murlet(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & Murlet(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(seed) |
|
Murlet(20) |
| MCC |
0.803 |
>
|
0.513 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.787
±
0.086
|
>
|
0.516
±
0.165
|
| Sensitivity |
0.752 |
>
|
0.461 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.861 |
>
|
0.579 |
| Total TP |
155 |
>
|
95 |
| Total TN |
23007 |
<
|
23023 |
| Total FP |
68 |
<
|
90 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
11 |
<
|
16 |
| Total FP INCONS |
14 |
<
|
53 |
| Total FP COMP |
43 |
>
|
21 |
| Total FN |
51 |
<
|
111 |
| P-value |
1.40919803867e-08 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Murlet(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Murlet(20)).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Murlet(20)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and Murlet(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and Murlet(20)).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
155 |
| Total TN |
23007 |
| Total FP |
68 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
11 |
| Total FP INCONS |
14 |
| Total FP COMP |
43 |
| Total FN |
51 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.803 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.787
±
0.086
|
| Sensitivity |
0.752 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.861 |
| Nr of predictions |
10 |
Performance of Murlet(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
95 |
| Total TN |
23023 |
| Total FP |
90 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
16 |
| Total FP INCONS |
53 |
| Total FP COMP |
21 |
| Total FN |
111 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.513 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.516
±
0.165
|
| Sensitivity |
0.461 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.579 |
| Nr of predictions |
10 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|