CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & PETfold_pre2.0(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) PETfold_pre2.0(20)
MCC 0.803 > 0.718
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.788 ± 0.076 > 0.637 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.751 > 0.682
Positive Predictive Value 0.859 > 0.758
Total TP 335 > 304
Total TN 183479 > 183468
Total FP 146 < 163
Total FP CONTRA 18 < 26
Total FP INCONS 37 < 71
Total FP COMP 91 > 66
Total FN 111 < 142
P-value 1.34193807955e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(20)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 335
Total TN 183479
Total FP 146
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 91
Total FN 111
Total Scores
MCC 0.803
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.788 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.751
Positive Predictive Value 0.859
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2C_N 0.80 0.75 0.86 180 160472 78 7 23 48 60
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 4 3 0 1 1
3J3E_8 0.71 0.67 0.77 10 2729 8 1 2 5 5
3J3F_8 0.86 0.84 0.89 16 4743 13 2 0 11 3
3ZEX_C 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 5354 12 1 2 9 12
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7
4FRG_B 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 1180 3 0 2 1 4

^top



Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 304
Total TN 183468
Total FP 163
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 142
Total Scores
MCC 0.718
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.637 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.682
Positive Predictive Value 0.758
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J2C_N 0.80 0.75 0.85 181 160469 69 12 20 37 59
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 7 2728 11 2 5 4 8
3J3F_8 0.34 0.37 0.32 7 4739 24 5 10 9 12
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.24 0.29 7 5350 20 1 16 3 22
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7
4FRG_B 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 1181 2 0 1 1 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.