Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of RNAwolf
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(seed) |
|
RNAwolf |
| MCC |
0.831 |
>
|
0.491 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.774
±
0.073
|
>
|
0.426
±
0.155
|
| Sensitivity |
0.802 |
>
|
0.496 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.863 |
>
|
0.488 |
| Total TP |
603 |
>
|
373 |
| Total TN |
451981 |
>
|
451916 |
| Total FP |
216 |
<
|
500 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
35 |
<
|
87 |
| Total FP INCONS |
61 |
<
|
304 |
| Total FP COMP |
120 |
>
|
109 |
| Total FN |
149 |
<
|
379 |
| P-value |
1.80908287419e-08 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and RNAwolf).
-
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and RNAwolf).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and RNAwolf).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
603 |
| Total TN |
451981 |
| Total FP |
216 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
35 |
| Total FP INCONS |
61 |
| Total FP COMP |
120 |
| Total FN |
149 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.831 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.774
±
0.073
|
| Sensitivity |
0.802 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.863 |
| Nr of predictions |
16 |
Performance of RNAwolf
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
373 |
| Total TN |
451916 |
| Total FP |
500 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
87 |
| Total FP INCONS |
304 |
| Total FP COMP |
109 |
| Total FN |
379 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.491 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.426
±
0.155
|
| Sensitivity |
0.496 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.488 |
| Nr of predictions |
16 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|