CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) Cylofold
MCC 0.826 > 0.780
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.802 ± 0.111 < 0.811 ± 0.191
Sensitivity 0.752 = 0.752
Positive Predictive Value 0.915 > 0.819
Total TP 118 = 118
Total TN 7096 > 7081
Total FP 13 < 28
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 9
Total FP INCONS 8 < 17
Total FP COMP 2 = 2
Total FN 39 = 39
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 118
Total TN 7096
Total FP 13
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 39
Total Scores
MCC 0.826
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.802 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.752
Positive Predictive Value 0.915
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7
4FRG_B 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 1183 1 0 1 0 6

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 118
Total TN 7081
Total FP 28
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 17
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 39
Total Scores
MCC 0.780
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.811 ± 0.191
Sensitivity 0.752
Positive Predictive Value 0.819
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.