CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) MXScarna(seed)
MCC 0.650 > 0.597
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.622 ± 0.182 > 0.570 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.592 > 0.538
Positive Predictive Value 0.721 > 0.672
Total TP 142 > 129
Total TN 24421 < 24426
Total FP 76 < 110
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 25
Total FP INCONS 44 > 38
Total FP COMP 21 < 47
Total FN 98 < 111
P-value 1.47941000302e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and MXScarna(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and MXScarna(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and MXScarna(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 142
Total TN 24421
Total FP 76
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 44
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 98
Total Scores
MCC 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.622 ± 0.182
Sensitivity 0.592
Positive Predictive Value 0.721
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.21 0.20 0.23 3 2729 13 2 8 3 12
3J3F_8 0.37 0.37 0.37 7 4742 20 5 7 8 12
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 9 5355 14 0 10 4 20
4A1C_2 0.27 0.25 0.29 5 4499 16 1 11 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7
4FRG_B 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 1183 1 0 1 0 6

^top



Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 129
Total TN 24426
Total FP 110
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 47
Total FN 111
Total Scores
MCC 0.597
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.570 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.538
Positive Predictive Value 0.672
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1200 1 1 0 0 3
3J3E_8 0.23 0.20 0.27 3 2731 14 3 5 6 12
3J3F_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 9 4743 21 5 4 12 10
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 4 4 1 7
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 21 3 6 12 20
4A1C_2 0.45 0.40 0.50 8 4500 20 4 4 12 12
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.49 0.42 0.59 10 1185 8 2 5 1 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.