CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.618 > 0.535
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.589 ± 0.187 > 0.535 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.557 > 0.342
Positive Predictive Value 0.693 < 0.843
Total TP 122 > 75
Total TN 23223 < 23310
Total FP 75 > 17
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 1
Total FP INCONS 44 > 13
Total FP COMP 21 > 3
Total FN 97 < 144
P-value 1.05690340753e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 122
Total TN 23223
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 44
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 97
Total Scores
MCC 0.618
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.589 ± 0.187
Sensitivity 0.557
Positive Predictive Value 0.693
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.21 0.20 0.23 3 2729 13 2 8 3 12
3J3F_8 0.37 0.37 0.37 7 4742 20 5 7 8 12
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 9 5355 14 0 10 4 20
4A1C_2 0.27 0.25 0.29 5 4499 16 1 11 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7
4FRG_B 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 1183 1 0 1 0 6

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 75
Total TN 23310
Total FP 17
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 144
Total Scores
MCC 0.535
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.535 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.342
Positive Predictive Value 0.843
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.36 0.13 1.00 2 2740 2 0 0 2 13
3J3F_8 0.61 0.37 1.00 7 4754 0 0 0 0 12
3RKF_A 0.62 0.50 0.80 12 851 3 1 2 0 12
3SD1_A 0.56 0.38 0.85 11 1520 2 0 2 0 18
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.24 1.00 7 5367 0 0 0 0 22
4A1C_2 0.59 0.35 1.00 7 4509 0 0 0 0 13
4AOB_A 0.69 0.48 1.00 14 1423 1 0 0 1 15
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9
4FRG_B 0.17 0.13 0.25 3 1190 9 0 9 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.