CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) RDfolder
MCC 0.829 > 0.608
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.807 ± 0.113 > 0.603 ± 0.206
Sensitivity 0.770 > 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.900 > 0.711
Total TP 117 > 81
Total TN 6861 < 6877
Total FP 15 < 35
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 8
Total FP INCONS 7 < 25
Total FP COMP 2 = 2
Total FN 35 < 71
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 117
Total TN 6861
Total FP 15
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 7
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 35
Total Scores
MCC 0.829
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.807 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.770
Positive Predictive Value 0.900
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 81
Total TN 6877
Total FP 35
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 71
Total Scores
MCC 0.608
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.206
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.711
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.82 0.76 0.89 16 1201 3 1 1 1 5
3J3D_C 0.76 0.79 0.75 15 948 5 3 2 0 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.