CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.624 > 0.480
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.199 > 0.514 ± 0.210
Sensitivity 0.573 > 0.500
Positive Predictive Value 0.686 > 0.470
Total TP 118 > 103
Total TN 23015 > 22968
Total FP 75 < 171
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 50
Total FP INCONS 42 < 66
Total FP COMP 21 < 55
Total FN 88 < 103
P-value 1.55268413083e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 118
Total TN 23015
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 42
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 88
Total Scores
MCC 0.624
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.199
Sensitivity 0.573
Positive Predictive Value 0.686
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 1 1 0 0 1
3J3D_C 0.87 0.89 0.85 17 948 3 3 0 0 2
3J3E_8 0.21 0.20 0.23 3 2729 13 2 8 3 12
3J3F_8 0.37 0.37 0.37 7 4742 20 5 7 8 12
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 9 5355 14 0 10 4 20
4A1C_2 0.27 0.25 0.29 5 4499 16 1 11 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7
4FRG_B 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 1183 1 0 1 0 6

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 103
Total TN 22968
Total FP 171
Total FP CONTRA 50
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 55
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.480
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.210
Sensitivity 0.500
Positive Predictive Value 0.470
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 30 6 12 12 15
3J3F_8 0.39 0.47 0.32 9 4733 38 10 9 19 10
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.34 0.31 10 5342 36 8 14 14 19
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.