CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.591 > 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.561 ± 0.200 < 0.574 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.533 < 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.662 > 0.560
Total TP 104 < 108
Total TN 22040 > 22004
Total FP 74 < 129
Total FP CONTRA 10 < 31
Total FP INCONS 43 < 54
Total FP COMP 21 < 44
Total FN 91 > 87
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 104
Total TN 22040
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 43
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 91
Total Scores
MCC 0.591
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.561 ± 0.200
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.662
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.21 0.20 0.23 3 2729 13 2 8 3 12
3J3F_8 0.37 0.37 0.37 7 4742 20 5 7 8 12
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 9 5355 14 0 10 4 20
4A1C_2 0.27 0.25 0.29 5 4499 16 1 11 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 108
Total TN 22004
Total FP 129
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 87
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.560
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.34 10 4732 35 9 10 16 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.