CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Pknots & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Pknots Afold
MCC 0.687 > 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.672 ± 0.127 > 0.547 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.712 > 0.609
Positive Predictive Value 0.673 > 0.592
Total TP 346 > 296
Total TN 31399 < 31413
Total FP 216 < 262
Total FP CONTRA 58 > 48
Total FP INCONS 110 < 156
Total FP COMP 48 < 58
Total FN 140 < 190
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Pknots and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and Afold).

^top





Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 346
Total TN 31399
Total FP 216
Total FP CONTRA 58
Total FP INCONS 110
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 140
Total Scores
MCC 0.687
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.672 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.712
Positive Predictive Value 0.673
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.17 0.25 0.17 2 224 10 3 7 0 6
2LC8_A 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 510 3 2 1 0 3
2M58_A - 0.60 0.58 0.64 7 533 4 1 3 0 5
2RP0_A - 0.87 1.00 0.78 7 107 2 2 0 0 0
2ZZN_D 0.95 0.95 0.95 21 962 1 1 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.50 0.55 0.48 12 1083 13 3 10 0 10
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 0 0 0 0 1
3GCA_A - 0.66 0.57 0.80 4 153 3 0 1 2 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 0 1 0 3
3IWN_A 0.22 0.21 0.25 6 1448 18 2 16 0 22
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.09 2 2720 33 5 15 13 13
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3LA5_A 0.94 0.88 1.00 22 932 0 0 0 0 3
3NKB_B - 0.64 0.68 0.62 13 714 8 0 8 0 6
3NPB_A 0.84 0.81 0.88 30 2244 9 0 4 5 7
3O58_3 0.32 0.45 0.24 10 4722 39 18 14 7 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3U4M_B - 0.33 0.36 0.32 8 1251 17 4 13 0 14
3W3S_B 0.78 0.76 0.81 25 1958 7 1 5 1 8
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.29 8 4488 36 9 11 16 12
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 6 6 0 0 4
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4JRC_A - 0.94 0.94 0.94 16 605 1 1 0 0 1

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 296
Total TN 31413
Total FP 262
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 156
Total FP COMP 58
Total FN 190
Total Scores
MCC 0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.547 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.609
Positive Predictive Value 0.592
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 228 8 1 7 0 8
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2M58_A - 0.40 0.42 0.42 5 532 8 1 6 1 7
2RP0_A - 0.76 0.71 0.83 5 110 1 0 1 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 962 3 2 0 1 2
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3ADB_C - 0.85 0.85 0.85 28 1786 6 0 5 1 5
3GCA_A - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 151 9 1 6 2 7
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.67 0.68 0.68 19 1444 9 1 8 0 9
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 31 6 13 12 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 6 5 0 1 4
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4
4JRC_A - 0.27 0.29 0.29 5 605 12 0 12 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.