CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Pknots & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Pknots CRWrnafold
MCC 0.562 > 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.274 > 0.510 ± 0.264
Sensitivity 0.585 > 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.554 > 0.503
Total TP 93 > 82
Total TN 10501 < 10506
Total FP 95 < 103
Total FP CONTRA 23 < 27
Total FP INCONS 52 < 54
Total FP COMP 20 < 22
Total FN 66 < 77
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Pknots and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 93
Total TN 10501
Total FP 95
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 52
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 66
Total Scores
MCC 0.562
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.274
Sensitivity 0.585
Positive Predictive Value 0.554
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 510 3 2 1 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.36 0.36 4 400 8 3 4 1 7
3SD1_A 0.78 0.76 0.81 22 1506 5 1 4 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.33 0.36 0.32 8 1251 17 4 13 0 14
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.29 8 4488 36 9 11 16 12
4AOB_A 0.19 0.21 0.21 6 1409 23 3 19 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 82
Total TN 10506
Total FP 103
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.264
Sensitivity 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.503
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 3 2 1 7
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 44 8 20 16 15
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 8 4 3 1 9
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 2 0 0 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.