CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PknotsRG & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PknotsRG ContextFold
MCC 0.473 > 0.436
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.575 ± 0.127 > 0.566 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.514 > 0.429
Positive Predictive Value 0.436 < 0.444
Total TP 388 > 324
Total TN 453848 < 454007
Total FP 597 > 474
Total FP CONTRA 147 > 112
Total FP INCONS 354 > 294
Total FP COMP 96 > 68
Total FN 367 < 431
P-value 3.73968271671e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PknotsRG and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and ContextFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and ContextFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PknotsRG and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 388
Total TN 453848
Total FP 597
Total FP CONTRA 147
Total FP INCONS 354
Total FP COMP 96
Total FN 367
Total Scores
MCC 0.473
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.575 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.436
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.66 0.61 0.73 11 513 4 2 2 0 7
2M58_A - 0.96 1.00 0.92 12 531 1 1 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.18 0.22 2 402 8 3 4 1 9
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J3D_C 0.63 0.68 0.59 13 946 9 3 6 0 6
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 30 6 13 11 10
3J3F_8 0.32 0.42 0.24 8 4728 40 12 13 15 11
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.64 0.64 0.66 21 1957 12 4 7 1 12
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 44 5 23 16 19
3ZEX_B - 0.36 0.40 0.33 140 420927 323 78 207 38 206
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 43 11 20 12 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ATO_G - 0.88 1.00 0.78 7 211 2 2 0 0 0
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15
4FRN_A 0.59 0.57 0.62 16 1822 10 2 8 0 12
4JF2_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 22 1056 4 4 0 0 2
4JRC_A - 0.34 0.35 0.35 6 605 11 0 11 0 11

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 324
Total TN 454007
Total FP 474
Total FP CONTRA 112
Total FP INCONS 294
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 431
Total Scores
MCC 0.436
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.566 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.429
Positive Predictive Value 0.444
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
2M58_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 530 14 3 11 0 12
3J0L_a - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 402 2 0 1 1 3
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J3D_C 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 949 4 3 1 0 4
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2722 29 12 8 9 15
3J3F_8 0.36 0.42 0.31 8 4735 32 9 9 14 11
3U4M_B - 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1255 0 0 0 0 1
3W1K_J 0.90 0.87 0.93 27 1649 2 1 1 0 4
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
3ZEX_B - 0.23 0.23 0.23 81 420993 296 62 216 18 265
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 218 2 1 1 0 7
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17
4JF2_A 0.57 0.50 0.67 12 1064 6 2 4 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 608 0 0 0 0 3

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.