CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PknotsRG & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PknotsRG TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.615 > 0.610
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.643 ± 0.180 > 0.598 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.659 > 0.598
Positive Predictive Value 0.582 < 0.630
Total TP 195 > 177
Total TN 26998 < 27052
Total FP 195 > 148
Total FP CONTRA 52 > 36
Total FP INCONS 88 > 68
Total FP COMP 55 > 44
Total FN 101 < 119
P-value 0.000456986317391

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PknotsRG and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and TurboFold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PknotsRG and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 195
Total TN 26998
Total FP 195
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 88
Total FP COMP 55
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.615
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.643 ± 0.180
Sensitivity 0.659
Positive Predictive Value 0.582
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.66 0.61 0.73 11 513 4 2 2 0 7
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 30 6 13 11 10
3J3F_8 0.32 0.42 0.24 8 4728 40 12 13 15 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 44 5 23 16 19
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 43 11 20 12 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRN_A 0.59 0.57 0.62 16 1822 10 2 8 0 12
4JF2_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 22 1056 4 4 0 0 2

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 177
Total TN 27052
Total FP 148
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 68
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 119
Total Scores
MCC 0.610
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.598
Positive Predictive Value 0.630
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.34 10 4732 35 9 10 16 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.