CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot Afold
MCC 0.424 > 0.419
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.442 ± 0.176 < 0.496 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.463 < 0.465
Positive Predictive Value 0.390 > 0.380
Total TP 349 < 350
Total TN 489984 > 489958
Total FP 669 < 686
Total FP CONTRA 182 < 187
Total FP INCONS 365 < 385
Total FP COMP 122 > 114
Total FN 404 > 403
P-value 3.42322841337e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Afold).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 349
Total TN 489984
Total FP 669
Total FP CONTRA 182
Total FP INCONS 365
Total FP COMP 122
Total FN 404
Total Scores
MCC 0.424
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.442 ± 0.176
Sensitivity 0.463
Positive Predictive Value 0.390
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2M58_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 529 15 0 15 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22346 97 41 36 20 34
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2718 37 6 18 13 15
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
3W3S_B 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1957 1 0 0 1 1
3ZEX_B - 0.35 0.38 0.33 133 420946 320 82 191 47 213
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 5 5 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4JRC_A - 0.28 0.29 0.31 5 606 11 0 11 0 12

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 350
Total TN 489958
Total FP 686
Total FP CONTRA 187
Total FP INCONS 385
Total FP COMP 114
Total FN 403
Total Scores
MCC 0.419
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.496 ± 0.120
Sensitivity 0.465
Positive Predictive Value 0.380
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2M58_A - 0.40 0.42 0.42 5 532 8 1 6 1 7
3IYQ_A 0.23 0.33 0.17 17 22339 97 47 37 13 34
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 31 6 13 12 10
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
3ZEX_B - 0.34 0.38 0.31 132 420926 337 77 217 43 214
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 6 5 0 1 4
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4
4JRC_A - 0.27 0.29 0.29 5 605 12 0 12 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.