CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot RDfolder
MCC 0.609 > 0.513
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.566 ± 0.160 > 0.506 ± 0.193
Sensitivity 0.619 > 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.616 > 0.600
Total TP 159 > 117
Total TN 11238 < 11301
Total FP 104 > 80
Total FP CONTRA 34 > 18
Total FP INCONS 65 > 60
Total FP COMP 5 > 2
Total FN 98 < 140
P-value 2.20167918023e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 159
Total TN 11238
Total FP 104
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 65
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 98
Total Scores
MCC 0.609
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.566 ± 0.160
Sensitivity 0.619
Positive Predictive Value 0.616
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.60 0.64 0.58 7 399 6 4 1 1 4
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J3D_C 0.46 0.53 0.42 10 944 14 6 8 0 9
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3W3S_B 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1957 1 0 0 1 1
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 5 5 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7
4JRC_A - 0.28 0.29 0.31 5 606 11 0 11 0 12

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 117
Total TN 11301
Total FP 80
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 140
Total Scores
MCC 0.513
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.506 ± 0.193
Sensitivity 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.600
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3J20_0 0.82 0.76 0.89 16 1201 3 1 1 1 5
3J3D_C 0.76 0.79 0.75 15 948 5 3 2 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.43 0.42 0.47 8 718 9 2 7 0 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
3W3S_B 0.29 0.27 0.33 9 1962 18 2 16 0 24
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ATO_G - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 216 0 0 0 0 3
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9
4JRC_A - 0.94 0.88 1.00 15 607 0 0 0 0 2

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.