CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.580 > 0.497
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.552 ± 0.125 > 0.202 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.608 > 0.365
Positive Predictive Value 0.554 < 0.678
Total TP 645 > 387
Total TN 513773 < 514366
Total FP 682 > 257
Total FP CONTRA 177 > 40
Total FP INCONS 342 > 144
Total FP COMP 163 > 73
Total FN 415 < 673
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 645
Total TN 513773
Total FP 682
Total FP CONTRA 177
Total FP INCONS 342
Total FP COMP 163
Total FN 415
Total Scores
MCC 0.580
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.552 ± 0.125
Sensitivity 0.608
Positive Predictive Value 0.554
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22346 97 41 36 20 34
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J20_2 0.61 0.61 0.60 253 421947 227 32 136 59 159
3J3D_C 0.46 0.53 0.42 10 944 14 6 8 0 9
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2718 37 6 18 13 15
3J3F_8 0.39 0.47 0.33 9 4734 38 9 9 20 10
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3W1K_J 0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1957 1 0 0 1 1
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.52 0.45 15 5341 22 4 14 4 14
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7
4FRG_B 0.38 0.38 0.41 9 1180 13 6 7 0 15
4FRN_A 0.49 0.46 0.54 13 1824 11 6 5 0 15
4JF2_A 0.91 0.92 0.92 22 1058 2 2 0 0 2

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 387
Total TN 514366
Total FP 257
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 144
Total FP COMP 73
Total FN 673
Total Scores
MCC 0.497
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.202 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.365
Positive Predictive Value 0.678
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3IYQ_A 0.16 0.10 0.26 5 22421 21 10 4 7 46
3IZ4_A 0.26 0.11 0.63 10 25520 7 2 4 1 85
3J20_0 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1215 4 0 4 0 21
3J20_2 0.77 0.76 0.78 312 421966 152 18 72 62 100
3J3D_C -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 964 4 1 3 0 19
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_8 0.19 0.11 0.33 2 4755 5 3 1 1 17
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2274 4 0 4 0 37
3O58_3 0.28 0.14 0.60 3 4759 2 0 2 0 19
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4832 8 0 8 0 50
3RKF_A 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 847 1 1 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3W1K_J 0.57 0.35 0.92 11 1666 1 0 1 0 20
3W3S_B 0.45 0.36 0.57 12 1968 10 1 8 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.13 0.07 0.25 2 5366 6 2 4 0 27
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4512 5 2 2 1 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1430 1 0 1 0 23
4ENB_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 467 2 0 2 0 12
4ENC_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 491 2 0 2 0 12
4FRG_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1200 2 0 2 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1845 3 0 3 0 28
4JF2_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1078 4 0 4 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.