CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot Vsfold4
MCC 0.546 > 0.486
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.519 ± 0.119 > 0.492 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.590 > 0.493
Positive Predictive Value 0.511 > 0.487
Total TP 396 > 331
Total TN 88726 < 88821
Total FP 489 > 425
Total FP CONTRA 151 > 121
Total FP INCONS 228 = 228
Total FP COMP 110 > 76
Total FN 275 < 340
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 396
Total TN 88726
Total FP 489
Total FP CONTRA 151
Total FP INCONS 228
Total FP COMP 110
Total FN 275
Total Scores
MCC 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.519 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.590
Positive Predictive Value 0.511
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.82 0.87 0.77 20 1998 15 6 0 9 3
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2M58_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 529 15 0 15 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22346 97 41 36 20 34
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3J0L_a - 0.60 0.64 0.58 7 399 6 4 1 1 4
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J3D_C 0.46 0.53 0.42 10 944 14 6 8 0 9
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2718 37 6 18 13 15
3J3F_8 0.39 0.47 0.33 9 4734 38 9 9 20 10
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
3W3S_B 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1957 1 0 0 1 1
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 5 5 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7
4FRG_B 0.38 0.38 0.41 9 1180 13 6 7 0 15
4JF2_A 0.91 0.92 0.92 22 1058 2 2 0 0 2
4JRC_A - 0.28 0.29 0.31 5 606 11 0 11 0 12

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 331
Total TN 88821
Total FP 425
Total FP CONTRA 121
Total FP INCONS 228
Total FP COMP 76
Total FN 340
Total Scores
MCC 0.486
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.492 ± 0.114
Sensitivity 0.493
Positive Predictive Value 0.487
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.84 0.83 0.86 19 2002 9 2 1 6 4
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2M58_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 538 6 0 6 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.27 0.35 0.21 18 22353 80 40 29 11 33
3IZ4_A 0.39 0.39 0.39 37 25441 63 15 43 5 58
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 4 1 1 7
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J3D_C 0.48 0.53 0.45 10 946 12 4 8 0 9
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.09 2 2720 32 9 11 12 13
3J3F_8 0.35 0.42 0.30 8 4734 30 11 8 11 11
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.66 0.59 0.73 22 2248 10 0 8 2 15
3O58_3 0.12 0.14 0.11 3 4737 35 8 16 11 19
3PDR_A 0.69 0.64 0.74 32 4797 13 3 8 2 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.23 0.24 0.24 7 1504 22 5 17 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.74 0.70 0.79 23 1960 7 1 5 1 10
4A1C_2 0.36 0.40 0.33 8 4492 28 4 12 12 12
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 5 5 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4JF2_A 0.74 0.67 0.84 16 1063 3 0 3 0 8
4JRC_A - 0.34 0.29 0.42 5 610 7 0 7 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.