CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt Afold
MCC 0.547 > 0.436
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.248 > 0.444 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.560 > 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.546 > 0.417
Total TP 89 > 75
Total TN 12746 > 12729
Total FP 96 < 138
Total FP CONTRA 32 > 30
Total FP INCONS 42 < 75
Total FP COMP 22 < 33
Total FN 70 < 84
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Afold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Afold).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 89
Total TN 12746
Total FP 96
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 42
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 70
Total Scores
MCC 0.547
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.248
Sensitivity 0.560
Positive Predictive Value 0.546
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
2M58_A - 0.37 0.33 0.44 4 535 5 4 1 0 8
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 30 6 12 12 15
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.90 0.85 0.97 28 1960 2 0 1 1 5
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 6 6 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4JRC_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 16 606 0 0 0 0 1

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 75
Total TN 12729
Total FP 138
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 84
Total Scores
MCC 0.436
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.444 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.417
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2M58_A - 0.40 0.42 0.42 5 532 8 1 6 1 7
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 31 6 13 12 10
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 6 5 0 1 4
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4
4JRC_A - 0.27 0.29 0.29 5 605 12 0 12 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.