CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt Multilign(20)
MCC 0.506 > 0.441
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.535 ± 0.233 > 0.450 ± 0.232
Sensitivity 0.525 > 0.458
Positive Predictive Value 0.497 > 0.435
Total TP 93 > 81
Total TN 17626 < 17627
Total FP 135 > 129
Total FP CONTRA 42 > 35
Total FP INCONS 52 < 70
Total FP COMP 41 > 24
Total FN 84 < 96
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 93
Total TN 17626
Total FP 135
Total FP CONTRA 42
Total FP INCONS 52
Total FP COMP 41
Total FN 84
Total Scores
MCC 0.506
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.535 ± 0.233
Sensitivity 0.525
Positive Predictive Value 0.497
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 30 6 12 12 15
3J3F_8 0.39 0.47 0.32 9 4733 38 10 9 19 10
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 81
Total TN 17627
Total FP 129
Total FP CONTRA 35
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 96
Total Scores
MCC 0.441
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.450 ± 0.232
Sensitivity 0.458
Positive Predictive Value 0.435
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.68 0.71 0.65 15 1196 9 2 6 1 6
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2720 22 8 14 0 15
3J3F_8 0.45 0.53 0.38 10 4735 30 7 9 14 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.13 0.13 0.17 3 1184 15 2 13 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.