CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.489 > 0.390
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.469 ± 0.303 > 0.380 ± 0.216
Sensitivity 0.513 > 0.323
Positive Predictive Value 0.474 < 0.481
Total TP 81 > 51
Total TN 20821 < 20886
Total FP 145 > 85
Total FP CONTRA 37 > 16
Total FP INCONS 53 > 39
Total FP COMP 55 > 30
Total FN 77 < 107
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 81
Total TN 20821
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 53
Total FP COMP 55
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.489
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.469 ± 0.303
Sensitivity 0.513
Positive Predictive Value 0.474
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 30 6 12 12 15
3J3F_8 0.39 0.47 0.32 9 4733 38 10 9 19 10
3W3S_B 0.90 0.85 0.97 28 1960 2 0 1 1 5
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.34 0.31 10 5342 36 8 14 14 19
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 51
Total TN 20886
Total FP 85
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 39
Total FP COMP 30
Total FN 107
Total Scores
MCC 0.390
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.380 ± 0.216
Sensitivity 0.323
Positive Predictive Value 0.481
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3J3E_8 0.18 0.20 0.18 3 2725 22 5 9 8 12
3J3F_8 0.47 0.47 0.47 9 4742 18 5 5 8 10
3W3S_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 12 1977 1 0 0 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 14 2 7 5 20
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12
4JF2_A 0.64 0.42 1.00 10 1072 0 0 0 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.