CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) Afold
MCC 0.661 > 0.547
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.686 ± 0.192 > 0.562 ± 0.223
Sensitivity 0.582 > 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.755 > 0.524
Total TP 185 > 184
Total TN 45005 > 44899
Total FP 103 < 221
Total FP CONTRA 28 < 57
Total FP INCONS 32 < 110
Total FP COMP 43 < 54
Total FN 133 < 134
P-value 1.69265863073e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 185
Total TN 45005
Total FP 103
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 32
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 133
Total Scores
MCC 0.661
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.686 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.582
Positive Predictive Value 0.755
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.41 0.65 39 25476 26 15 6 5 56
3J3E_8 0.19 0.20 0.19 3 2726 21 5 8 8 12
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 2257 5 0 0 5 16
3O58_3 0.51 0.50 0.52 11 4743 19 5 5 9 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 184
Total TN 44899
Total FP 221
Total FP CONTRA 57
Total FP INCONS 110
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 134
Total Scores
MCC 0.547
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.562 ± 0.223
Sensitivity 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.524
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 31 6 13 12 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.