CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) ContextFold
MCC 0.573 > 0.558
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.587 ± 0.193 > 0.569 ± 0.212
Sensitivity 0.539 < 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.617 > 0.580
Total TP 111 < 112
Total TN 23007 > 22994
Total FP 106 < 129
Total FP CONTRA 21 < 37
Total FP INCONS 48 > 44
Total FP COMP 37 < 48
Total FN 95 > 94
P-value 5.46655682781e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and ContextFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and ContextFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 111
Total TN 23007
Total FP 106
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 48
Total FP COMP 37
Total FN 95
Total Scores
MCC 0.573
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.587 ± 0.193
Sensitivity 0.539
Positive Predictive Value 0.617
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.19 0.20 0.19 3 2726 21 5 8 8 12
3J3F_8 0.43 0.47 0.39 9 4738 20 6 8 6 10
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.39 9 5351 21 3 11 7 20
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.64 0.54 0.76 13 1185 4 0 4 0 11

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 112
Total TN 22994
Total FP 129
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 44
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 94
Total Scores
MCC 0.558
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.569 ± 0.212
Sensitivity 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.580
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J3D_C 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 949 4 3 1 0 4
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2722 29 12 8 9 15
3J3F_8 0.36 0.42 0.31 8 4735 32 9 9 14 11
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.