CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) Cylofold
MCC 0.768 > 0.752
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.760 ± 0.105 < 0.773 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.681 < 0.734
Positive Predictive Value 0.872 > 0.778
Total TP 156 < 168
Total TN 16650 > 16613
Total FP 36 < 62
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 19
Total FP INCONS 16 < 29
Total FP COMP 13 < 14
Total FN 73 > 61
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 156
Total TN 16650
Total FP 36
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 73
Total Scores
MCC 0.768
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.760 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.872
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3O58_3 0.51 0.50 0.52 11 4743 19 5 5 9 11
3PDR_A 0.84 0.76 0.93 38 4799 5 1 2 2 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.64 0.54 0.76 13 1185 4 0 4 0 11

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 168
Total TN 16613
Total FP 62
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.752
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.773 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.734
Positive Predictive Value 0.778
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.