CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.565 > 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.573 ± 0.211 < 0.574 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.518 < 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.623 > 0.560
Total TP 101 < 108
Total TN 22035 > 22004
Total FP 97 < 129
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 31
Total FP INCONS 44 < 54
Total FP COMP 36 < 44
Total FN 94 > 87
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 22035
Total FP 97
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 44
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 94
Total Scores
MCC 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.573 ± 0.211
Sensitivity 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.623
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.19 0.20 0.19 3 2726 21 5 8 8 12
3J3F_8 0.43 0.47 0.39 9 4738 20 6 8 6 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.39 9 5351 21 3 11 7 20
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 108
Total TN 22004
Total FP 129
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 87
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.560
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.34 10 4732 35 9 10 16 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.