CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & Murlet(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) Murlet(20)
MCC 0.576 > 0.552
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.564 ± 0.217 > 0.544 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.525 > 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.638 > 0.600
Total TP 95 > 93
Total TN 25310 > 25304
Total FP 88 > 84
Total FP CONTRA 21 > 19
Total FP INCONS 33 < 43
Total FP COMP 34 > 22
Total FN 86 < 88
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and Murlet(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Murlet(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Murlet(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and Murlet(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Murlet(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 95
Total TN 25310
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 34
Total FN 86
Total Scores
MCC 0.576
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.564 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.525
Positive Predictive Value 0.638
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.18 0.20 0.18 3 2725 22 5 9 8 12
3J3F_8 0.47 0.47 0.47 9 4742 18 5 5 8 10
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 14 2 7 5 20
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12

^top



Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 93
Total TN 25304
Total FP 84
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 43
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 88
Total Scores
MCC 0.552
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.544 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.600
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IVN_B 0.80 0.65 1.00 15 888 0 0 0 0 8
3J3E_8 0.35 0.33 0.38 5 2729 13 2 6 5 10
3J3F_8 0.54 0.53 0.56 10 4743 13 2 6 5 9
3O58_3 0.37 0.32 0.44 7 4748 13 4 5 4 15
3RKF_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 850 0 0 0 0 8
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 4 1 0 5
3ZEX_C 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 5351 16 2 10 4 18
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.20 5 4491 24 5 15 4 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.