CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.390 > 0.244
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.378 ± 0.269 > 0.257 ± 0.262
Sensitivity 0.326 < 0.333
Positive Predictive Value 0.477 > 0.191
Total TP 42 < 43
Total TN 15530 > 15393
Total FP 71 < 229
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 62
Total FP INCONS 32 < 120
Total FP COMP 25 < 47
Total FN 87 > 86
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 42
Total TN 15530
Total FP 71
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 32
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 87
Total Scores
MCC 0.390
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.378 ± 0.269
Sensitivity 0.326
Positive Predictive Value 0.477
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3J3E_8 0.18 0.20 0.18 3 2725 22 5 9 8 12
3J3F_8 0.47 0.47 0.47 9 4742 18 5 5 8 10
3W3S_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 12 1977 1 0 0 1 21
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12
4JF2_A 0.64 0.42 1.00 10 1072 0 0 0 0 14

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 43
Total TN 15393
Total FP 229
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 120
Total FP COMP 47
Total FN 86
Total Scores
MCC 0.244
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.257 ± 0.262
Sensitivity 0.333
Positive Predictive Value 0.191
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.54 0.61 0.50 11 506 11 1 10 0 7
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2707 47 11 24 12 15
3J3F_8 0.30 0.47 0.19 9 4714 57 21 17 19 10
3W3S_B 0.18 0.21 0.18 7 1949 34 2 31 1 26
4A1C_2 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4469 61 18 29 14 20
4JF2_A 0.55 0.67 0.47 16 1048 19 9 9 1 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.