CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.563 > 0.356
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.542 ± 0.178 > 0.265 ± 0.203
Sensitivity 0.472 > 0.224
Positive Predictive Value 0.678 > 0.577
Total TP 135 > 64
Total TN 30359 < 30447
Total FP 99 > 50
Total FP CONTRA 21 > 10
Total FP INCONS 43 > 37
Total FP COMP 35 > 3
Total FN 151 < 222
P-value 1.52299983238e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 135
Total TN 30359
Total FP 99
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 43
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 151
Total Scores
MCC 0.563
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.542 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.678
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3A3A_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 18 1482 0 0 0 0 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.18 0.20 0.18 3 2725 22 5 9 8 12
3J3F_8 0.47 0.47 0.47 9 4742 18 5 5 8 10
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3W3S_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 12 1977 1 0 0 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 14 2 7 5 20
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12
4JF2_A 0.64 0.42 1.00 10 1072 0 0 0 0 14

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 64
Total TN 30447
Total FP 50
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 222
Total Scores
MCC 0.356
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.265 ± 0.203
Sensitivity 0.224
Positive Predictive Value 0.577
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3A3A_A 0.53 0.37 0.79 11 1486 3 0 3 0 19
3IVN_B 0.81 0.70 0.94 16 886 1 1 0 0 7
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_8 0.19 0.11 0.33 2 4755 5 3 1 1 17
3O58_3 0.28 0.14 0.60 3 4759 2 0 2 0 19
3RKF_A 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 847 1 1 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3W3S_B 0.45 0.36 0.57 12 1968 10 1 8 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.13 0.07 0.25 2 5366 6 2 4 0 27
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4512 5 2 2 1 20
4JF2_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1078 4 0 4 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.