CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) Vsfold5
MCC 0.581 > 0.569
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.555 ± 0.195 > 0.538 ± 0.255
Sensitivity 0.490 < 0.603
Positive Predictive Value 0.696 > 0.546
Total TP 126 < 155
Total TN 25003 > 24900
Total FP 85 < 181
Total FP CONTRA 19 < 54
Total FP INCONS 36 < 75
Total FP COMP 30 < 52
Total FN 131 > 102
P-value 5.83740878464e-05

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 126
Total TN 25003
Total FP 85
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 30
Total FN 131
Total Scores
MCC 0.581
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.555 ± 0.195
Sensitivity 0.490
Positive Predictive Value 0.696
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3A3A_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 18 1482 0 0 0 0 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.18 0.20 0.18 3 2725 22 5 9 8 12
3J3F_8 0.47 0.47 0.47 9 4742 18 5 5 8 10
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3W3S_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 12 1977 1 0 0 1 21
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12
4JF2_A 0.64 0.42 1.00 10 1072 0 0 0 0 14

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 155
Total TN 24900
Total FP 181
Total FP CONTRA 54
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 52
Total FN 102
Total Scores
MCC 0.569
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.538 ± 0.255
Sensitivity 0.603
Positive Predictive Value 0.546
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3A3A_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 1473 0 0 0 0 3
3IVN_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 885 0 0 0 0 5
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.08 2 2718 31 10 12 9 13
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 38 13 11 14 10
3O58_3 0.51 0.59 0.45 13 4735 28 11 5 12 9
3RKF_A 0.90 0.92 0.88 22 841 3 3 0 0 2
3SD1_A 0.13 0.14 0.15 4 1507 22 5 17 0 25
3W3S_B 0.83 0.85 0.82 28 1955 7 2 4 1 5
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4JF2_A 0.96 1.00 0.92 24 1056 2 2 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.