CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(20) & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(20) RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.576 > 0.576
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.562 ± 0.207 < 0.564 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.558 > 0.525
Positive Predictive Value 0.601 < 0.638
Total TP 101 > 95
Total TN 25291 < 25310
Total FP 84 < 88
Total FP CONTRA 22 > 21
Total FP INCONS 45 > 33
Total FP COMP 17 < 34
Total FN 80 < 86
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(20) and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(20) and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 25291
Total FP 84
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 80
Total Scores
MCC 0.576
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.562 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.558
Positive Predictive Value 0.601
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IVN_B 0.86 0.78 0.95 18 884 1 1 0 0 5
3J3E_8 0.34 0.33 0.36 5 2728 9 3 6 0 10
3J3F_8 0.54 0.58 0.50 11 4739 20 4 7 9 8
3O58_3 0.42 0.36 0.50 8 4748 9 3 5 1 14
3RKF_A 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 848 1 0 1 0 7
3SD1_A 0.84 0.86 0.83 25 1503 5 4 1 0 4
3ZEX_C 0.46 0.41 0.52 12 5351 16 2 9 5 17
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 23 5 16 2 15

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 95
Total TN 25310
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 34
Total FN 86
Total Scores
MCC 0.576
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.564 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.525
Positive Predictive Value 0.638
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.18 0.20 0.18 3 2725 22 5 9 8 12
3J3F_8 0.47 0.47 0.47 9 4742 18 5 5 8 10
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 14 2 7 5 20
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.