CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.644 > 0.585
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.171 > 0.574 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.481 < 0.573
Positive Predictive Value 0.870 > 0.606
Total TP 141 < 168
Total TN 23310 > 23195
Total FP 29 < 142
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 41
Total FP INCONS 16 < 68
Total FP COMP 8 < 33
Total FN 152 > 125
P-value 1.87872347734e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 141
Total TN 23310
Total FP 29
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 152
Total Scores
MCC 0.644
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.171
Sensitivity 0.481
Positive Predictive Value 0.870
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_8 0.61 0.37 1.00 7 4754 2 0 0 2 12
3RKF_A 0.74 0.67 0.84 16 847 3 1 2 0 8
3SD1_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1513 3 2 1 0 12
3W3S_B 0.71 0.52 1.00 17 1972 2 0 0 2 16
4A1C_2 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 4511 2 0 0 2 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 2 0 0 2 8
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9
4FRG_B 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 1185 0 0 0 0 7
4FRN_A 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 1827 2 1 1 0 9
4JF2_A 0.61 0.42 0.91 10 1071 1 1 0 0 14

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 168
Total TN 23195
Total FP 142
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 68
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 125
Total Scores
MCC 0.585
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.573
Positive Predictive Value 0.606
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
3J3E_8 0.07 0.07 0.09 1 2731 16 4 6 6 14
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 36 11 13 12 10
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3W3S_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 29 1960 1 0 0 1 4
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.43 0.50 0.40 12 1172 18 6 12 0 12
4FRN_A 0.37 0.46 0.32 13 1807 28 11 17 0 15
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.