CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

FAQ

Metric	RNAalifold(seed)		ContextFold
MCC	0.767	>	0.759
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.589 ± 0.163	>	0.583 ± 0.154
Sensitivity	0.670	<	0.740
Positive Predictive Value	0.878	>	0.780
Total TP	477	<	527
Total TN	449950	>	449817
Total FP	129	<	242
Total FP CONTRA	13	<	57
Total FP INCONS	53	<	92
Total FP COMP	63	<	93
Total FN	235	>	185
P-value	0.000103482201598

Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and ContextFold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and ContextFold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and ContextFold).

Total Scores
MCC	0.767
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.589 ± 0.163
Sensitivity	0.670
Positive Predictive Value	0.878
Nr of predictions	14

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	516	12	0	12	0	18
3J20_2	SSU_rRNA_archaea links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.83	0.87	343	421974	104	11	40	53	69
3J3E_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	2742	0	0	0	0	15
3J3F_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.37	1.00	7	4754	2	0	0	2	12
3W1K_J	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.78	0.61	1.00	19	1659	0	0	0	0	12
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.52	1.00	17	1972	2	0	0	2	16
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.49	0.24	1.00	7	5367	2	0	0	2	22
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.50	0.25	1.00	5	4511	2	0	0	2	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.72	1.00	21	1416	2	0	0	2	8
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.40	1.00	6	466	0	0	0	0	9
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.40	1.00	6	490	0	0	0	0	9
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.84	0.71	1.00	17	1185	0	0	0	0	7
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.78	0.68	0.90	19	1827	2	1	1	0	9
4JF2_A	preQ1-II links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.42	0.91	10	1071	1	1	0	0	14

Total Scores
MCC	0.759
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.583 ± 0.154
Sensitivity	0.740
Positive Predictive Value	0.780
Nr of predictions	14

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.56	0.63	10	512	6	0	6	0	8
3J20_2	SSU_rRNA_archaea links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.88	0.89	362	421963	88	15	28	45	50
3J3E_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	2722	29	12	8	9	15
3J3F_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.36	0.42	0.31	8	4735	32	9	9	14	11
3W1K_J	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.87	0.93	27	1649	2	1	1	0	4
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.87	0.85	0.90	28	1958	4	0	3	1	5
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.41	0.48	12	5349	23	4	9	10	17
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.26	0.25	0.28	5	4498	26	3	10	13	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.62	0.59	0.68	17	1412	9	2	6	1	12
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.60	1.00	9	463	0	0	0	0	6
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.60	0.90	9	486	1	1	0	0	6
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.71	0.85	17	1182	3	2	1	0	7
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.39	0.46	11	1824	13	6	7	0	17
4JF2_A	preQ1-II links to Rfam database...	0.57	0.50	0.67	12	1064	6	2	4	0	12

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.