CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) Cylofold
MCC 0.701 > 0.672
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.661 ± 0.164 < 0.687 ± 0.181
Sensitivity 0.557 < 0.638
Positive Predictive Value 0.889 > 0.718
Total TP 160 < 183
Total TN 19795 > 19720
Total FP 26 < 86
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 25
Total FP INCONS 16 < 47
Total FP COMP 6 < 14
Total FN 127 > 104
P-value 1.82148498286e-05

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 160
Total TN 19795
Total FP 26
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 127
Total Scores
MCC 0.701
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.661 ± 0.164
Sensitivity 0.557
Positive Predictive Value 0.889
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
3O58_3 0.60 0.36 1.00 8 4756 1 0 0 1 14
3PDR_A 0.81 0.66 1.00 33 4807 1 0 0 1 17
3RKF_A 0.74 0.67 0.84 16 847 3 1 2 0 8
3SD1_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1513 3 2 1 0 12
3W3S_B 0.71 0.52 1.00 17 1972 2 0 0 2 16
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 2 0 0 2 8
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9
4FRG_B 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 1185 0 0 0 0 7
4FRN_A 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 1827 2 1 1 0 9

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 183
Total TN 19720
Total FP 86
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 47
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 104
Total Scores
MCC 0.672
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.687 ± 0.181
Sensitivity 0.638
Positive Predictive Value 0.718
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3W3S_B 0.48 0.45 0.52 15 1960 15 1 13 1 18
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3
4FRN_A 0.23 0.18 0.31 5 1832 11 7 4 0 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.