CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.562 > 0.295
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.485 ± 0.271 > 0.324 ± 0.213
Sensitivity 0.382 = 0.382
Positive Predictive Value 0.835 > 0.241
Total TP 66 = 66
Total TN 17472 > 17277
Total FP 21 < 258
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 68
Total FP INCONS 12 < 140
Total FP COMP 8 < 50
Total FN 107 = 107
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 66
Total TN 17472
Total FP 21
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 12
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 107
Total Scores
MCC 0.562
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.485 ± 0.271
Sensitivity 0.382
Positive Predictive Value 0.835
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_8 0.61 0.37 1.00 7 4754 2 0 0 2 12
3W3S_B 0.71 0.52 1.00 17 1972 2 0 0 2 16
4A1C_2 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 4511 2 0 0 2 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 2 0 0 2 8
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9
4JF2_A 0.61 0.42 0.91 10 1071 1 1 0 0 14

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 66
Total TN 17277
Total FP 258
Total FP CONTRA 68
Total FP INCONS 140
Total FP COMP 50
Total FN 107
Total Scores
MCC 0.295
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.324 ± 0.213
Sensitivity 0.382
Positive Predictive Value 0.241
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.54 0.61 0.50 11 506 11 1 10 0 7
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2707 47 11 24 12 15
3J3F_8 0.30 0.47 0.19 9 4714 57 21 17 19 10
3W3S_B 0.18 0.21 0.18 7 1949 34 2 31 1 26
4A1C_2 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4469 61 18 29 14 20
4AOB_A 0.39 0.41 0.39 12 1406 20 4 15 1 17
4ENC_A 0.66 0.73 0.61 11 478 9 2 5 2 4
4JF2_A 0.55 0.67 0.47 16 1048 19 9 9 1 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.