CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAsubopt & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAsubopt Vsfold5
MCC 0.579 > 0.523
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.563 ± 0.091 > 0.556 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.608 > 0.527
Positive Predictive Value 0.558 > 0.527
Total TP 579 > 502
Total TN 102122 < 102207
Total FP 557 > 530
Total FP CONTRA 169 > 158
Total FP INCONS 289 < 292
Total FP COMP 99 > 80
Total FN 373 < 450
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAsubopt and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAsubopt and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 579
Total TN 102122
Total FP 557
Total FP CONTRA 169
Total FP INCONS 289
Total FP COMP 99
Total FN 373
Total Scores
MCC 0.579
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.563 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.608
Positive Predictive Value 0.558
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 229 7 1 6 0 8
2KRL_A - 0.62 0.61 0.64 14 2002 15 5 3 7 9
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2M58_A - 0.60 0.58 0.64 7 533 4 1 3 0 5
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.52 0.55 0.52 12 961 11 3 8 0 10
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 0 0 0 0 1
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.53 0.54 0.54 15 1421 14 4 9 1 13
3IVN_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 885 0 0 0 0 5
3IWN_A 0.69 0.68 0.70 19 1445 9 1 7 1 9
3IYQ_A 0.28 0.39 0.20 20 22342 96 41 37 18 31
3IZ4_A 0.56 0.60 0.53 57 25429 54 26 24 4 38
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.36 0.36 4 400 8 3 4 1 7
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 2 11 1 9
3J3D_C 0.65 0.74 0.58 14 944 10 5 5 0 5
3J3E_8 0.25 0.33 0.20 5 2717 32 7 13 12 10
3J3F_8 0.35 0.47 0.26 9 4726 42 13 13 16 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1090 21 4 17 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.66 0.68 0.65 13 715 7 0 7 0 6
3NPB_A 0.84 0.78 0.91 29 2246 8 0 3 5 8
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 35 6 15 14 11
3PDR_A 0.90 0.90 0.90 45 4790 7 2 3 2 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.95 0.94 0.97 31 1957 2 0 1 1 2
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4481 43 13 17 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.62 0.64 18 1409 11 4 6 1 11
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 6 6 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 7 0 7 0 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15
4FRN_A 0.58 0.57 0.59 16 1821 11 3 8 0 12
4JF2_A 0.69 0.67 0.73 16 1060 6 4 2 0 8
4JRC_A - 0.34 0.35 0.35 6 605 11 0 11 0 11

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 502
Total TN 102207
Total FP 530
Total FP CONTRA 158
Total FP INCONS 292
Total FP COMP 80
Total FN 450
Total Scores
MCC 0.523
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.527
Positive Predictive Value 0.527
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.77 0.88 0.70 7 226 3 2 1 0 1
2KRL_A - 0.71 0.78 0.64 18 1996 13 8 2 3 5
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2M58_A - 0.37 0.33 0.44 4 535 5 4 1 0 8
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.95 0.95 0.95 21 962 1 1 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3A3A_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 1473 0 0 0 0 3
3ADB_C - 0.72 0.61 0.87 20 1796 3 0 3 0 13
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 16 1425 9 0 8 1 12
3IVN_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 885 0 0 0 0 5
3IWN_A 0.26 0.25 0.30 7 1449 16 2 14 0 21
3IYQ_A 0.30 0.37 0.24 19 22361 71 36 24 11 32
3IZ4_A 0.31 0.31 0.33 29 25448 65 14 45 6 66
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 4 1 1 7
3J20_0 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1198 6 3 2 1 5
3J3D_C 0.63 0.68 0.59 13 946 9 3 6 0 6
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.08 2 2718 31 10 12 9 13
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 38 13 11 14 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1092 19 4 15 0 20
3LA5_A -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 938 16 0 16 0 25
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.62 0.54 0.71 20 2250 10 1 7 2 17
3O58_3 0.51 0.59 0.45 13 4735 28 11 5 12 9
3PDR_A 0.69 0.64 0.74 32 4797 13 3 8 2 18
3RKF_A 0.90 0.92 0.88 22 841 3 3 0 0 2
3SD1_A 0.13 0.14 0.15 4 1507 22 5 17 0 25
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.83 0.85 0.82 28 1955 7 2 4 1 5
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ATO_G - 0.67 0.86 0.55 6 209 5 5 0 0 1
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4FRN_A 0.15 0.14 0.17 4 1825 19 3 16 0 24
4JF2_A 0.96 1.00 0.92 24 1056 2 2 0 0 0
4JRC_A - 0.28 0.29 0.31 5 606 11 2 9 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.