CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAwolf & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAwolf RDfolder
MCC 0.555 > 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.500 ± 0.184 < 0.513 ± 0.211
Sensitivity 0.546 > 0.458
Positive Predictive Value 0.583 < 0.612
Total TP 130 > 109
Total TN 10538 < 10583
Total FP 99 > 71
Total FP CONTRA 19 > 16
Total FP INCONS 74 > 53
Total FP COMP 6 > 2
Total FN 108 < 129
P-value 3.02430207705e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAwolf and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAwolf and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 130
Total TN 10538
Total FP 99
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 74
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 108
Total Scores
MCC 0.555
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.500 ± 0.184
Sensitivity 0.546
Positive Predictive Value 0.583
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3W3S_B 0.70 0.70 0.72 23 1957 10 0 9 1 10
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ATO_G - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 213 7 4 3 0 7
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10
4JRC_A - 0.71 0.65 0.79 11 608 3 2 1 0 6

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 109
Total TN 10583
Total FP 71
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 53
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 129
Total Scores
MCC 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.513 ± 0.211
Sensitivity 0.458
Positive Predictive Value 0.612
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3J20_0 0.82 0.76 0.89 16 1201 3 1 1 1 5
3J3D_C 0.76 0.79 0.75 15 948 5 3 2 0 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
3W3S_B 0.29 0.27 0.33 9 1962 18 2 16 0 24
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ATO_G - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 216 0 0 0 0 3
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9
4JRC_A - 0.94 0.88 1.00 15 607 0 0 0 0 2

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.