CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) UNAFold
MCC 0.585 > 0.581
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.564 ± 0.144 > 0.562 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.534 < 0.602
Positive Predictive Value 0.649 > 0.568
Total TP 310 < 350
Total TN 68051 > 67913
Total FP 210 < 363
Total FP CONTRA 73 < 80
Total FP INCONS 95 < 186
Total FP COMP 42 < 97
Total FN 271 > 231
P-value 0.00213378455536

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 310
Total TN 68051
Total FP 210
Total FP CONTRA 73
Total FP INCONS 95
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 271
Total Scores
MCC 0.585
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.564 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.534
Positive Predictive Value 0.649
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.88 0.86 0.90 19 1087 2 0 2 0 3
3GX2_A 0.40 0.21 0.75 6 1441 2 1 1 0 22
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 1 0 0 3
3IZ4_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 54 25455 38 13 14 11 41
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J3D_C 0.82 0.84 0.80 16 948 4 3 1 0 3
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 19 5 13 1 15
3J3F_8 0.42 0.47 0.38 9 4737 26 9 6 11 10
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2272 6 1 5 0 37
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.30 11 4727 29 15 11 3 11
3PDR_A 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 4802 5 1 2 2 15
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
3ZEX_C 0.34 0.31 0.38 9 5350 19 3 12 4 20
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.19 0.13 0.33 3 1193 6 1 5 0 21

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 350
Total TN 67913
Total FP 363
Total FP CONTRA 80
Total FP INCONS 186
Total FP COMP 97
Total FN 231
Total Scores
MCC 0.581
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.562 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.602
Positive Predictive Value 0.568
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3GX2_A 0.81 0.79 0.85 22 1423 5 2 2 1 6
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.60 0.57 57 25436 53 12 31 10 38
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J3D_C 0.33 0.37 0.32 7 946 15 3 12 0 12
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.13 3 2718 32 6 15 11 12
3J3F_8 0.32 0.42 0.25 8 4729 44 12 12 20 11
3JYV_7 0.24 0.25 0.25 5 1091 16 7 8 1 15
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.85 0.78 0.94 29 2247 6 0 2 4 8
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 34 5 15 14 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 43 5 23 15 19
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 11 17 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.