CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.610 > 0.563
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.597 ± 0.186 > 0.542 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.601 > 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.625 < 0.678
Total TP 172 > 135
Total TN 30283 < 30359
Total FP 170 > 99
Total FP CONTRA 32 > 21
Total FP INCONS 71 > 43
Total FP COMP 67 > 35
Total FN 114 < 151
P-value 1.75835195567e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 172
Total TN 30283
Total FP 170
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 67
Total FN 114
Total Scores
MCC 0.610
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.597 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.601
Positive Predictive Value 0.625
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 0 5 0 11
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.08 2 2718 32 6 16 10 13
3J3F_8 0.39 0.47 0.33 9 4734 37 8 10 19 10
3O58_3 0.51 0.50 0.52 11 4743 18 2 8 8 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.78 0.72 0.84 21 1508 4 2 2 0 8
3W3S_B 0.63 0.64 0.64 21 1956 13 4 8 1 12
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.34 0.50 10 5354 27 2 8 17 19
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 34 8 14 12 15
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 135
Total TN 30359
Total FP 99
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 43
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 151
Total Scores
MCC 0.563
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.542 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.678
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3A3A_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 18 1482 0 0 0 0 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.18 0.20 0.18 3 2725 22 5 9 8 12
3J3F_8 0.47 0.47 0.47 9 4742 18 5 5 8 10
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3W3S_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 12 1977 1 0 0 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 14 2 7 5 20
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12
4JF2_A 0.64 0.42 1.00 10 1072 0 0 0 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.