CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold Vsfold5
MCC 0.611 > 0.523
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.604 ± 0.088 > 0.556 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.600 > 0.527
Positive Predictive Value 0.630 > 0.527
Total TP 571 > 502
Total TN 102252 > 102207
Total FP 424 < 530
Total FP CONTRA 118 < 158
Total FP INCONS 218 < 292
Total FP COMP 88 > 80
Total FN 381 < 450
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 571
Total TN 102252
Total FP 424
Total FP CONTRA 118
Total FP INCONS 218
Total FP COMP 88
Total FN 381
Total Scores
MCC 0.611
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.604 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.600
Positive Predictive Value 0.630
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 229 7 1 6 0 8
2KRL_A - 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2003 9 1 0 8 3
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 0 5 0 11
2M58_A - 0.34 0.25 0.50 3 538 3 1 2 0 9
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 3 2 0 1 1
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3ADB_C - 0.67 0.64 0.72 21 1790 9 0 8 1 12
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.86 0.79 0.96 22 1426 2 1 0 1 6
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.69 0.68 0.70 19 1445 9 1 7 1 9
3IYQ_A 0.25 0.33 0.19 17 22350 86 39 34 13 34
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.56 0.63 53 25452 34 14 17 3 42
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.64 0.50 7 397 8 5 2 1 4
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J3D_C 0.44 0.37 0.54 7 955 6 1 5 0 12
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.08 2 2718 32 6 16 10 13
3J3F_8 0.39 0.47 0.33 9 4734 37 8 10 19 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1095 16 2 14 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.75 0.74 0.78 14 717 4 0 4 0 5
3NPB_A 0.85 0.78 0.94 29 2247 7 0 2 5 8
3O58_3 0.51 0.50 0.52 11 4743 18 2 8 8 11
3PDR_A 0.82 0.80 0.85 40 4793 9 2 5 2 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.78 0.72 0.84 21 1508 4 2 2 0 8
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.63 0.64 0.64 21 1956 13 4 8 1 12
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 34 8 14 12 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ATO_G - 0.37 0.14 1.00 1 219 0 0 0 0 6
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.67 0.58 0.78 14 1184 4 3 1 0 10
4FRN_A 0.71 0.57 0.89 16 1830 2 2 0 0 12
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5
4JRC_A - 0.34 0.35 0.35 6 605 11 0 11 0 11

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 502
Total TN 102207
Total FP 530
Total FP CONTRA 158
Total FP INCONS 292
Total FP COMP 80
Total FN 450
Total Scores
MCC 0.523
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.527
Positive Predictive Value 0.527
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.77 0.88 0.70 7 226 3 2 1 0 1
2KRL_A - 0.71 0.78 0.64 18 1996 13 8 2 3 5
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2M58_A - 0.37 0.33 0.44 4 535 5 4 1 0 8
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.95 0.95 0.95 21 962 1 1 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3A3A_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 1473 0 0 0 0 3
3ADB_C - 0.72 0.61 0.87 20 1796 3 0 3 0 13
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 16 1425 9 0 8 1 12
3IVN_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 885 0 0 0 0 5
3IWN_A 0.26 0.25 0.30 7 1449 16 2 14 0 21
3IYQ_A 0.30 0.37 0.24 19 22361 71 36 24 11 32
3IZ4_A 0.31 0.31 0.33 29 25448 65 14 45 6 66
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 4 1 1 7
3J20_0 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1198 6 3 2 1 5
3J3D_C 0.63 0.68 0.59 13 946 9 3 6 0 6
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.08 2 2718 31 10 12 9 13
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 38 13 11 14 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1092 19 4 15 0 20
3LA5_A -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 938 16 0 16 0 25
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.62 0.54 0.71 20 2250 10 1 7 2 17
3O58_3 0.51 0.59 0.45 13 4735 28 11 5 12 9
3PDR_A 0.69 0.64 0.74 32 4797 13 3 8 2 18
3RKF_A 0.90 0.92 0.88 22 841 3 3 0 0 2
3SD1_A 0.13 0.14 0.15 4 1507 22 5 17 0 25
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.83 0.85 0.82 28 1955 7 2 4 1 5
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ATO_G - 0.67 0.86 0.55 6 209 5 5 0 0 1
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4FRN_A 0.15 0.14 0.17 4 1825 19 3 16 0 24
4JF2_A 0.96 1.00 0.92 24 1056 2 2 0 0 0
4JRC_A - 0.28 0.29 0.31 5 606 11 2 9 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.