CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & HotKnots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) HotKnots
MCC 0.636 > 0.463
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.647 ± 0.154 > 0.511 ± 0.216
Sensitivity 0.629 > 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.649 > 0.429
Total TP 163 > 133
Total TN 25335 > 25276
Total FP 132 < 224
Total FP CONTRA 32 < 58
Total FP INCONS 56 < 119
Total FP COMP 44 < 47
Total FN 96 < 126
P-value 2.00627773251e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and HotKnots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and HotKnots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and HotKnots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and HotKnots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and HotKnots).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 163
Total TN 25335
Total FP 132
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 56
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 96
Total Scores
MCC 0.636
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.647 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.629
Positive Predictive Value 0.649
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 1 5 1 5
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.34 10 4732 37 9 10 18 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 133
Total TN 25276
Total FP 224
Total FP CONTRA 58
Total FP INCONS 119
Total FP COMP 47
Total FN 126
Total Scores
MCC 0.463
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.511 ± 0.216
Sensitivity 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.429
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J3D_C 0.33 0.37 0.32 7 946 15 3 12 0 12
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.12 3 2717 33 7 15 11 12
3J3F_8 0.33 0.42 0.26 8 4730 43 11 12 20 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3ZEX_C -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5328 46 11 35 0 29
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 12 16 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.