CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) RDfolder
MCC 0.768 > 0.608
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.775 ± 0.087 > 0.603 ± 0.206
Sensitivity 0.717 > 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.832 > 0.711
Total TP 109 > 81
Total TN 6860 < 6877
Total FP 24 < 35
Total FP CONTRA 9 > 8
Total FP INCONS 13 < 25
Total FP COMP 2 = 2
Total FN 43 < 71
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 109
Total TN 6860
Total FP 24
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 43
Total Scores
MCC 0.768
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.775 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.717
Positive Predictive Value 0.832
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 1 5 1 5
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 81
Total TN 6877
Total FP 35
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 71
Total Scores
MCC 0.608
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.206
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.711
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.82 0.76 0.89 16 1201 3 1 1 1 5
3J3D_C 0.76 0.79 0.75 15 948 5 3 2 0 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.