CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Carnac(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Carnac(20)
MCC 0.553 > 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.185 > 0.402 ± 0.261
Sensitivity 0.554 > 0.349
Positive Predictive Value 0.560 < 0.861
Total TP 108 > 68
Total TN 22004 < 22118
Total FP 129 > 16
Total FP CONTRA 31 > 3
Total FP INCONS 54 > 8
Total FP COMP 44 > 5
Total FN 87 < 127
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Carnac(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Carnac(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Carnac(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 108
Total TN 22004
Total FP 129
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 87
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.560
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.34 10 4732 35 9 10 16 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 68
Total TN 22118
Total FP 16
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 127
Total Scores
MCC 0.546
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.402 ± 0.261
Sensitivity 0.349
Positive Predictive Value 0.861
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_8 0.61 0.37 1.00 7 4754 2 0 0 2 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.21 0.67 6 5365 4 1 2 1 23
4A1C_2 0.42 0.25 0.71 5 4509 3 0 2 1 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 14 1418 6 2 3 1 15
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.