CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Cylofold
MCC 0.667 > 0.662
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.649 ± 0.286 < 0.695 ± 0.271
Sensitivity 0.601 < 0.614
Positive Predictive Value 0.754 > 0.729
Total TP 95 < 97
Total TN 7054 > 7047
Total FP 32 < 37
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 14
Total FP INCONS 22 = 22
Total FP COMP 1 = 1
Total FN 63 > 61
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 95
Total TN 7054
Total FP 32
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 63
Total Scores
MCC 0.667
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.649 ± 0.286
Sensitivity 0.601
Positive Predictive Value 0.754
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 97
Total TN 7047
Total FP 37
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.662
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.695 ± 0.271
Sensitivity 0.614
Positive Predictive Value 0.729
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRN_A 0.23 0.18 0.31 5 1832 11 7 4 0 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.