CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Multilign(20)
MCC 0.563 > 0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.585 ± 0.214 > 0.493 ± 0.250
Sensitivity 0.572 > 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.562 > 0.491
Total TP 95 > 86
Total TN 16654 > 16648
Total FP 114 > 112
Total FP CONTRA 29 < 32
Total FP INCONS 45 < 57
Total FP COMP 40 > 23
Total FN 71 < 80
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 95
Total TN 16654
Total FP 114
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 40
Total FN 71
Total Scores
MCC 0.563
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.585 ± 0.214
Sensitivity 0.572
Positive Predictive Value 0.562
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.34 10 4732 35 9 10 16 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 86
Total TN 16648
Total FP 112
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 57
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 80
Total Scores
MCC 0.500
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.493 ± 0.250
Sensitivity 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.491
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2720 22 8 14 0 15
3J3F_8 0.45 0.53 0.38 10 4735 30 7 9 14 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.