CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Vsfold5
MCC 0.575 > 0.438
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.575 ± 0.209 > 0.461 ± 0.273
Sensitivity 0.568 > 0.462
Positive Predictive Value 0.593 > 0.429
Total TP 134 > 109
Total TN 20055 > 20027
Total FP 132 < 185
Total FP CONTRA 33 < 47
Total FP INCONS 59 < 98
Total FP COMP 40 = 40
Total FN 102 < 127
P-value 2.08252958266e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 134
Total TN 20055
Total FP 132
Total FP CONTRA 33
Total FP INCONS 59
Total FP COMP 40
Total FN 102
Total Scores
MCC 0.575
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.575 ± 0.209
Sensitivity 0.568
Positive Predictive Value 0.593
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.34 10 4732 35 9 10 16 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 109
Total TN 20027
Total FP 185
Total FP CONTRA 47
Total FP INCONS 98
Total FP COMP 40
Total FN 127
Total Scores
MCC 0.438
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.461 ± 0.273
Sensitivity 0.462
Positive Predictive Value 0.429
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.08 2 2718 31 10 12 9 13
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 38 13 11 14 10
3RKF_A 0.90 0.92 0.88 22 841 3 3 0 0 2
3SD1_A 0.13 0.14 0.15 4 1507 22 5 17 0 25
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRN_A 0.15 0.14 0.17 4 1825 19 3 16 0 24
4JF2_A 0.96 1.00 0.92 24 1056 2 2 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.