CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Vsfold5 & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Vsfold5 RDfolder
MCC 0.595 > 0.569
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.607 ± 0.143 > 0.577 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.576 > 0.510
Positive Predictive Value 0.632 < 0.653
Total TP 294 > 260
Total TN 22841 < 22908
Total FP 176 > 141
Total FP CONTRA 39 > 28
Total FP INCONS 132 > 110
Total FP COMP 5 > 3
Total FN 216 < 250
P-value 5.55261613711e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Vsfold5 and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold5 and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 294
Total TN 22841
Total FP 176
Total FP CONTRA 39
Total FP INCONS 132
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 216
Total Scores
MCC 0.595
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.607 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.576
Positive Predictive Value 0.632
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.77 0.88 0.70 7 226 3 2 1 0 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.95 0.95 0.95 21 962 1 1 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3A3A_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 1473 0 0 0 0 3
3ADB_C - 0.72 0.61 0.87 20 1796 3 0 3 0 13
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 16 1425 9 0 8 1 12
3IVN_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 885 0 0 0 0 5
3IWN_A 0.26 0.25 0.30 7 1449 16 2 14 0 21
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 4 1 1 7
3J20_0 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1198 6 3 2 1 5
3J3D_C 0.63 0.68 0.59 13 946 9 3 6 0 6
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1092 19 4 15 0 20
3LA5_A -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 938 16 0 16 0 25
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3RKF_A 0.90 0.92 0.88 22 841 3 3 0 0 2
3SD1_A 0.13 0.14 0.15 4 1507 22 5 17 0 25
3W3S_B 0.83 0.85 0.82 28 1955 7 2 4 1 5
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ATO_G - 0.67 0.86 0.55 6 209 5 5 0 0 1
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4JRC_A - 0.28 0.29 0.31 5 606 11 2 9 0 12

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 260
Total TN 22908
Total FP 141
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 110
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 250
Total Scores
MCC 0.569
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.577 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.510
Positive Predictive Value 0.653
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 231 0 0 0 0 3
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 2 2 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3A3A_A 0.59 0.50 0.71 15 1479 6 0 6 0 15
3ADB_C - 0.48 0.45 0.54 15 1791 13 1 12 0 18
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 16 1424 10 2 7 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1462 10 1 9 0 28
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3J20_0 0.82 0.76 0.89 16 1201 3 1 1 1 5
3J3D_C 0.76 0.79 0.75 15 948 5 3 2 0 4
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1091 20 4 16 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.43 0.42 0.47 8 718 9 2 7 0 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
3W3S_B 0.29 0.27 0.33 9 1962 18 2 16 0 24
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ATO_G - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 216 0 0 0 0 3
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9
4JRC_A - 0.94 0.88 1.00 15 607 0 0 0 0 2

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.